REMOTE VIEWING

F.A.Q.

www.firedocs.com/remoteviewing/faq.cfm




A note up front from PJ

What is remote viewing?

What are the different "types" of remote viewing?

What is 'ARV' or 'Associative RV'?

What determines how good a person is at remote viewing?

How do I make a target pool? How do I find targets? Where can I find a group to practice/talk with that are helpful, not a cult, and won't charge money?

I want to be a remote viewer. What kind of training do I need?

Can you learn to "remote view" without training?

What does psi-methods for-RV training cover and entail?

What happens AFTER training?

Where I can learn the remote viewing protocols?

I heard one guy say remote viewing can't be trained. But there's all these other guys selling training for it. What gives?

Starting Out After Training/Finding Jobs/Do's & Don'ts

What makes a good target for remote viewing?

I have out of body experiences sometimes. Is that remote viewing?

I've been remote viewing all my life. How can people say you have to know something special for it?

Could you find my best friend who disappeared last year?

A little about the U.S. government's STAR GATE project

The STAR GATE scientific research of RV

The STAR GATE military intelligence application of RV

How is remote viewing different from regular "psychic" stuff?

My friend says he has an almost 100% accuracy rate. Other people say that's impossible or he's lying. But he seems sincere.

Have a question?


 

Can you learn to "remote view" without training?

As training is in methodology, and remote viewing is in fact a protocol, then yes, of course you can. How you go about gathering psi data (your method) is really up to you. A lot of people work on getting in a mild trance state, relax greatly, and imagine themselves ‘opening up to information about the target’. As you get subtle impressions, no matter how fragmented or offbeat, write them down or speak into a tape recorder. You will shortly learn that people new to RV tend to add/revise half the data and forget to record the other half. ;-)

When done and looking at feedback, be discriminating about your session. Don’t do yourself any favors with ‘making data fit’ your feedback; but also, don’t be overly critical -- it’s not just a matter of an inexact art, but remember, you are new to this. The point in beginning to intermediate RV is not even so much the data as your learning something about how you process data. Concentrate on what you got right -- how you were thinking or feeling at that time, how the data seemed to present itself to you.

You might find that some data "feels like" it comes "inside quote marks". You might find that this data is usually accurate for you. You might find that usually when you get the impression of a triangle, the target is a waterfall -- who knows?! -- it is different for every person. While some data is literal, much data can be symbolic, and a very personal symbolic at that. It can come as humor, as lines of poetry, as your own responses (aesthetic reactions) to the target, as sudden memories invoked. Don’t judge the data or its form. Accept that you are new to this and be willing to take you get and see how things turn out on feedback.

Data can come in any form. You can hear it; you can hear aspects of yourself talking about it; you can feel it on or in your body; you can perceive it through any physical sense-- although most of the time, what happens is actually a ‘sensing’ that is somewhat ‘inside one’ (I call it "internal kinesthetics") that you know is associated with a certain physical sense, but often is not really getting the data from there. Literal visuals tend to the extremes with most people; they are usually either inaccurate most of the time for a person, or they are very accurate and the primary data a person gets--it depends on the person. (This is a general statement and it varies with a few criteria.) When you get a bunch of data all at once, like a giant ball of interconnected information and experience, this is usually target data.

Learn to sort it out, translate it, not mess it up too much, and get it down on paper, without messing up the protocol (nobody who knows the target should be present during the session), and you’ll be remote viewing.

-- PJ



The Firedocs Remote Viewing Collection is now a static archive (Feb 2008). Click here to see what's still online for reference.

All contents on this website are Copyright © 1995 to present by Palyne 'PJ' Gaenir. All rights reserved.
Permission is given to reproduce anything in small quantity, but online only, and please mention/link source.