Online Censorship :
Recreating the Past?
Don't say what you mean, say
what I mean! Here are some public
statements by Joe McMoneagle, Ingo Swann, and Paul H.
Smith.
For the
first time, soldiers from the Army intelligence RV unit
(McMoneagle, Smith and Buchanan) talked about that part
of the past in public, on the Art Bell radio show in late
March. Psi-Tech's VP Jonina Dourif then
"re-explained" what they "really
meant" on the Psi-Tech public BBS. The men in
question promptly provided public statements to correct
those misconceptions.
The fellow
who got nominated to post their clarifying statements on
the BBS (Joe Murgia) was banned from the site, the posts
from the men were deleted, and an unsurprisingly nasty
response was posted by Mrs. Dourif in its place,
insulting all the gentlemen who had been on the show; it
was also explained that NO further questioning of
Mr. Dames (or RV history, as that has been the real
question) would be allowed on the BBS; and, the original
post from Psi-Tech (replete with the attributions of
'what they said/meant' which the men had tried to
correct) was reposted again for good measure (with one
tiny and unmentioned correction).
As a
second, mostly unrelated but simultaneous issue,
Psi-Tech's VP had been telling people that Ingo
Swann (whom Ed Dames says he was the protege of) was
going to be appearing in the Psi-Tech chat room with Ed
for an online conference. Other "rumors" said
that this was going to be proof once and for all of Ed's
being right, and the other intelligence fellows (who
contradicted Ed on a few things on the Art Bell show)
wrong; that Ingo was going to support Ed and we'd see who
the expert really was. Many people sent me notes about
this, and eventually of course it ended up with somebody
asking Ingo about it. Never fond of the media, and
reclusive as well, Ingo issued a very small public
statement he asked to be posted.
Mrs.
Dourif of Psi-Tech moved Swann's statement to the
"gossip/trash" section of their web site
(designed to humiliate those posting politically
incorrectly) and provided the response linked below.
|