from the
Journal of Parapsychology


By Edwin C. May, Nevin D. Lantz, and Tom Piantineda

Cognitive Sciences Laboratory
330 Cowper Street, Suite 200
Palo Alto CA 94301

To determine from what time frame the data from anomalous cognition (AC) originate, we have examined the role of precognition and feedback on the quality of AC. In an otherwise standard AC protocol, we displayed feedback tachistoscopically to receivers. The cognitive awareness of the feedback experience was minimal, and 2 of the 8 intensities used for visual display of the feedback were below subliminal threshold. We hypothesized a number of possible relationships between feedback intensity and AC quality, including one based on precognition (i.e., the data originated from the future feedback). Four viewers contributed 40 trials each (5 at 8 different intensity bands). Using a sum-of-ranks statistic, 2 viewers produced independently significant evidence of remote viewing (i.e., the binomial probability of 2 hits in 4 trials with an event probability of .05 is .014). None of the data showed significant correlation of feedback intensity with AC quality. This result is discussed with regard to precognition in general and the troublesome unfalsifiability aspect of truly goal-oriented precognition.


Parapsychology Press

You can access the JoP web site here.

You can find subscription information for this excellent peer-reviewed science journal on their web site, or on the firedocs science page.

firedocs entrancefiredocs "RV/AC Science Page"